All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Solid Organ Transplantation Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
Results from a single-center, prospective cohort study with a historical control group, evaluating therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided valganciclovir dosing for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in adult lung transplant recipients, were published in the Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy by Katada et al. Historical controls received conventional dosing (n = 42) while the TDM-guided dosing group targeted ganciclovir trough concentrations of 300–800 ng/mL (n = 45). The primary outcome was valganciclovir discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), with secondary outcomes including valganciclovir-related AEs and CMV infection during prophylaxis.
Key data: Valganciclovir discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 35.7% of control vs 11.1% of TDM-guided patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.303; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.126–0.730), with leukopenia and neutropenia the most common causes of discontinuation. Median times to discontinuation due to AEs were 31.0 vs 39.0 days for the control vs TDM-guided group, respectively. Grade ≥3 neutropenia risk was lower with TDM-guided dosing (risk ratio [RR], 0.117; 95% CI, 0.015–0.894). Target ganciclovir trough concentrations of 300–800 ng/mL were achieved in 40.5% vs 62.2% of patients in the control and TDM-guided groups, respectively. CMV infection during prophylaxis occurred in 2.4% of control vs 0% of TDM-guided patients, with no CMV disease in either group.
Key learning: TDM-guided valganciclovir dosing may serve as a practical strategy to mitigate hematological toxicity and improve treatment continuation rates in lung transplant recipients, with prospective validation needed before broad implementation.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content