All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
The phase III, global, randomized, open-label, multicenter SOLSTICE study (NCT02931539), evaluated maribavir vs investigator-assigned therapy (IAT) for the treatment of refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following either hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or solid organ transplantation. Results from a subgroup analysis of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were published by Blumberg et al. in the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. The analysis included 211 SOT recipients (maribavir, n = 142; IAT, n = 69). The primary endpoint was CMV viremia clearance at Week 8.
Key data: At Week 8, higher rates of CMV viremia clearance were observed in patients who received maribavir vs those who received IAT (55.6% vs 26.1%; adjusted difference, 30.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3–43.6; p < 0.001). The CMV viremia clearance benefit with maribavir vs IAT was observed across SOT types, including kidney (59.5% vs 34.4%), lung (47.5% vs 13.6%), and heart (42.9% vs 11.1%). Rates of CMV viremia clearance with symptom control maintained from Week 8 to 16 were comparable between cohorts (maribavir, 13.4% vs IAT, 11.6%; adjusted difference, 2.4%; 95% CI, −7.05 to 11.83; p = 0.620). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 96.5% and 88.4% of patients receiving maribavir and IAT, respectively. Treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs were lower with maribavir vs IAT (3.5% vs 23.2%).
Key learning: Maribavir demonstrated superior CMV viremia clearance vs IAT in patients with refractory CMV infection following SOT, regardless of transplanted organ, supporting its feasibility as a treatment option in this clinical setting.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content