All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Incidence and predictors of malignancy after heart transplantation: A UNOS registry analysis

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Mar 16, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in heart transplantation.


Results from an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry, evaluating the incidence and risk factors for de novo malignancy after heart transplantation (N = 50,370), were published in the American Heart Journal by Magod et al

Key data: The 10-year incidence of de novo post-transplant malignancy was 20.6%. In multivariable analysis, increased odds of de novo malignancy were associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.06), male sex (female vs male; OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58–0.68), and history of cigarette use (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11–1.28). Additional risk factors included induction immunosuppression with muromonab‑CD3 (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23–1.76) or use of >1 induction agent (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14–1.82), as well as hospitalization for infection (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18–1.33).

Key learning: De novo malignancy is a common long-term complication after heart transplantation and is associated with multiple clinical and treatment-related risk factors, supporting the need for risk-adapted cancer surveillance and prevention strategies.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content