All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CAVIAR phase II: Alirocumab + rosuvastatin for CAV after heart transplant

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Feb 16, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in heart transplantation.


Results from the randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase II CAVIAR study (NCT03537742), comparing alirocumab + rosuvastatin with placebo + rosuvastatin for the prevention of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in heart transplant recipients (N = 114), were recently published in Circulation by Fearon et al. The primary endpoint was change in coronary artery plaque volume from baseline to 1 year. Secondary endpoints included differences in lipid particle values, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); differences in coronary physiology (fractional flow reserve [FFR], coronary flow reserve [CFR], and index of microcirculatory resistance [IMR]); and differences in intravascular ultrasound with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS-IVUS) parameters. 

Key data: The primary endpoint was not met. The change in plaque volume from baseline to 1 year did not differ between groups (mean difference in differences, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–1.14; p = 0.86). LDL-C decreased from baseline to 1 year in the alirocumab arm (72.7 ± 31.7 to 31.5 ± 20.7 mg/dL; p < 0.001) and did not change with placebo (69.0 ± 22.4 to 69.2 ± 28.1 mg/dL; p = 0.92). There were no changes in FFR (p = 0.89), CFR (p = 0.68), or IMR (p = 1.00) in patients treated with alirocumab. Patients receiving placebo showed no changes in FFR (p = 0.22) or IMR (p = 0.41) but had increased CFR (p = 0.02). No significant treatment-related adverse events were reported with alirocumab.

Key learning: The addition of alirocumab to statin therapy early after heart transplantation lowered LDL-C but did not reduce coronary artery plaque progression after 1 year compared with rosuvastatin alone in patients with low baseline LDL-C levels.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content