All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

VIP BOLT interim analysis: VA-ECMO vs off-pump bilateral lung transplantation

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

May 8, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lung transplantation.


Interim results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter VIP BOLT trial (NCT05547698), comparing intraoperative venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO; n = 44) with an off-pump approach (n = 31) in adults without severe pulmonary hypertension who received bilateral lung transplantation, were published in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery by Villavicencio et al. The primary endpoint was Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) at 48–72 hours. 

Key data: Grade 3 PGD at 48–72 hours occurred in 13.6% in the VA-ECMO group vs 19.4% in the off-pump group (p = 0.506). Secondary endpoints showed no significant differences: 90-day or in-hospital mortality (2.3% vs 6.5%; p = 0.363), composite Grade 3 PGD / death (13.6% vs 25.8%; p = 0.183), Grade 3 PGD at 0–24 hours (15.9% vs 29.0%; p = 0.172), pneumonia (15.9% vs 35.5%; p = 0.051), or any serious adverse event (SAE; 77.3% vs 87.1%; p = 0.282). VA-ECMO required significantly more fresh-frozen plasma and platelet transfusion. 

Key learning: Both intraoperative VA-ECMO and off-pump bilateral lung transplantation demonstrated comparable early efficacy and safety in patients without severe pulmonary hypertension. Continued enrollment toward the 228-participant target is needed to adequately power the trial.  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content