All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Survival outcomes with bilateral lung vs heart-lung transplantation for pulmonary arterial hypertension

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Apr 22, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lung transplantation.


Results from an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry, comparing outcomes of bilateral lung (n = 776) vs heart-lung transplantation (n = 138) in adults with primary pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), were published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation by Zarrabian et al. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality (ACM) at 1 year, with 5‑year ACM as the secondary endpoint. 

Key data: In multivariable analysis, heart-lung transplantation was not associated with higher 1‑year ACM vs bilateral lung transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–3.72; p = 0.10); 5‑year ACM was also comparable between groups (aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.87–2.54; p = 0.14). Findings were consistent across hemodynamic subgroups. During follow-up, 44.4% of the overall cohort died, with unadjusted mortality higher among heart-lung recipients than bilateral lung recipients (55.1% vs 42.7%); however, median survival was longer with heart-lung transplantation in unadjusted analyses (1,005 vs 705 days; p = 0.04). 

Key learning: Bilateral lung transplantation was associated with comparable 1- and 5‑year survival to heart-lung transplantation in patients with PAH, supporting its role as a viable alternative in appropriately selected patients. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content