All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Reduced-intensity immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Apr 1, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in kidney transplantation.


Results from a single-center, retrospective study, evaluating immunosuppressive regimens in older kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), were published in the Brazilian Journal of Nephrology by Alcântara et al. Dosing of immunosuppressive therapies during the first year post-transplantation was compared between older KTRs (≥60 years; n = 59) and younger controls (30–50 years; n = 114).

Key data: Compared with younger controls, older KTRs received lower mycophenolate doses (11 ± 7.7 vs 15 ± 7.2 mg/kg/day; p = 0.003) and were less likely to receive corticosteroids as maintenance therapy (18.6% vs 64.9%; p = 0.0001). Despite lower tacrolimus doses, older KTRs had a higher tacrolimus level-to-dose ratio (p < 0.05). Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in older KTRs, including leukopenia (56.5% vs 35.6%; p = 0.017) and cytomegalovirus infection (44.7% vs 26.9%; p = 0.034). One-year overall survival (OS) was lower in older KTRs (86.4% vs 95.6%; p = 0.014), while graft survival was comparable between groups (86.8% vs 92.7%; p = 0.780)

Key learning: Reduced-intensity immunosuppression in older KTRs was associated with comparable short-term graft survival but higher rates of AEs and lower OS, supporting an individualized approach to immunosuppressive dosing in this population.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content