All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
Results from a US nationwide registry analysis, evaluating the impact of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) on outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplantation, were published in Annals of Surgery by Kusakabe et al. Data were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) to balance donor and recipient characteristics (NRP, n = 2,131; non-NRP, n = 10,598). NRP was classified as 30–180 minutes from circulatory death to cross-clamp. The primary endpoint was overall graft survival.
Key data: After PSM, NRP was associated with lower graft loss compared with non-NRP procurement at 1 year (6.5% vs 8.2%; p = 0.042) and 3 years (12.1% vs 18.0%; p = 0.005). Patient mortality at 3 years post-transplant was lower in the NRP group (7.4% vs 12.5%; p = 0.031); 1-year mortality was similar between groups (4% vs 4.8%; p = 0.48). The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was lower with NRP compared with non-NRP (30.3% vs 49.7%; risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–0.65; p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, the 1-year graft survival benefit with NRP was most pronounced among higher-risk subgroups, including transplants involving older donors and recipients.
Key learning: NRP was associated with improved graft survival and reduced DGF compared with non-NRP procurement in DCD kidney transplantation, with pronounced benefits observed among higher-risk subgroups.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content