All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Solid Organ Transplantation Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
Results from a multicenter, retrospective, ODDCAT database study, comparing outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation (HT) performed across 22 centers in the US and Europe (Belgium, Spain, and the UK), were published in the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation by Louca et al. Data from 223 HT recipients in Europe and 281 in the US were analyzed. The primary outcome was survival at 1 year.
Key data: Survival at 1 year was higher in US (n = 281) vs European (n = 223) HT recipients, (91.8% vs 86.6%; p = 0.043), while 30-day survival (97.5% vs 95.5%) and 3-year survival (79.8% vs 82.0%) were similar. Overall survival did not differ between regions (p = 0.69). Among recipients undergoing direct procurement and preservation (DPP), 1-year survival was higher in the US vs Europe (91.9% vs 82.6%; p = 0.021), whereas there was no difference in survival at any time point between regions among recipients undergoing thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (taNRP). Post-transplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was less common in the US vs Europe (11.0% vs 17.9%; p = 0.03). No significant differences in biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (ACR) or rejection-free survival were observed between regions.
Key learning: In this retrospective study, 1-year survival was higher in US vs European HT recipients; however, overall survival was comparable. These findings support the continued use of DCD HT while highlighting the need for further international data to optimize donor heart utilization and recipient outcomes.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.
Your opinion matters
Which of the following additional evidence do you think would have the greatest impact on clinicians’ choice to adopt ECP in SOT?