All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Solid Organ Transplantation Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
Results from an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry, comparing 1-year cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in adult heart transplant recipients undergoing transplantation with donation after circulatory death (DCD; n = 1,237) vs donation after brain death (DBD; n = 11,393) hearts, were published in the American Heart Journal by Madan et al.
Key data: The risk of CAV at 1 year was similar between DBD and DCD recipients (6.22% vs 5.90%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–1.28; p = 0.94) and remained similar in adjusted logistic regression (LR) models. In propensity score-matched cohorts, 1-year CAV rates were similar for DBD vs DCD-direct procurement and perfusion (DPP; 4.97% vs 5.70%; p = 0.548) and DBD vs DCD-normothermic regional perfusion (NRP; 9.63% vs 6.23%; p = 0.097).
Key learning: These findings show that rates of CAV at 1 year were similar between DCD and DBD heart transplant recipients, irrespective of DPP or NRP procurement method, supporting continued DCD donor utilization to expand heart transplant access. However, further evaluation is needed to understand the intermediate- and long-term CAV risk in DCD heart transplant recipients.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What do you consider to be the single greatest barrier to increased use of ECP in SOT patients at your center?