All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Contemporary immunosuppression practices in simultaneous heart–kidney transplantation

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

May 15, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in solid organ transplantation.


A United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry analysis, evaluating contemporary immunosuppression practices and associated outcomes in adult simultaneous heartkidney transplant (SHKT) recipients (N = 2,634), was published in Pharmacotherapy by Huang et al. The study included patients transplanted between January 2013 and June 2024, with 1-year follow-up available through June 2025. One-year outcomes included treated rejection, graft failure, hospitalization for infection, and mortality. 

Key data: T-cell-depleting agents remained the most frequently used induction strategy (41.3%), followed by basiliximab (36.8%) and no induction (21.9%). Following the 2018 allocation policy change, basiliximab use increased (27% to 41%), while anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) use declined (50% to 37%). Most patients received tacrolimus (95.1%), mycophenolate (94.8%), and corticosteroids (90.5%) at discharge; at 1 year, tacrolimus remained the most common maintenance immunosuppressant (79.5%). At 1 year post-transplant, 81.5% of patients were being treated with ≥2 immunosuppressants. Rates of treated rejection, hospitalization for infection, graft failure, and survival at 1 year were comparable across induction strategies. 

Key learning: Contemporary immunosuppression practices in SHKT have shifted toward increased basiliximab use while maintaining tacrolimus-based multidrug regimens. Comparable 1-year outcomes across induction strategies support further evaluation of individualized immunosuppression approaches in SHKT recipients. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content