All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Solid Organ Transplantation Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASSIST CLAD phase II: MSCs for new onset CLAD

By Megan Moore

Share:

Aug 28, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lung transplantation.


Results from the multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled, phase II ASSIST CLAD trial, evaluating intravenous (IV) allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs; n = 27) vs placebo (n = 31) in lung transplant recipients with new-onset chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), were published in the Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation by Chambers et al. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality and freedom from CLAD progression. CLAD progression was defined as a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >10% from the mean of the screening and baseline FEV1

Key data: PFS at 12 months was 41% in the MSC group vs 55% in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42–1.29; p = 0.30). Lung function decline was similar between groups; the slope coefficient for FEV₁ decline was –6.43 mL/week vs –9.14 mL/week (difference, 2.56 mL/week; p = 0.50) and the median slope coefficient for forced vital capacity (FVC) decline was –4.58 mL/week vs –4.19 mL/week (difference, –0.39; p = 0.85) in the MSC vs placebo groups, respectively. The rate of adverse events (AEs) was similar between groups. The most common AEs in both groups were respiratory tract infections, dyspnea, and fatigue. There were no Grade ≥3 infusion-related AEs.   

Key learning: Intravenous allogeneic MSC therapy did not significantly improve PFS or reduce the rate of lung function decline in lung transplant recipients with new-onset CLAD vs placebo.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content