All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The SOT Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a founding grant from Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

TIBURON study: Donor-derived and total cfDNA across lung allograft injury states

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

May 29, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lung transplantation.


Results from TIBURON (Transplant Investigation of Biomarker Utility in Rejection), a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational pilot study evaluating donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) and total cfDNA (TcfDNA) across lung allograft injury states in adult lung transplant recipients, were published in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics by Betensley et al. The study analyzed 354 plasma samples from 66 lung transplant recipients; stratified into stable, acute rejection (AR), infectious disease (ID), and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) cohorts, with stable double lung transplant recipients further stratified as baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD) and non-BLAD. 

Key data: Median dd-cfDNA was higher in the AR vs the stable cohort (2.08% vs 0.60% p = 0.019), with trends toward elevation in the ID (1.19%; p = 0.066) and CLAD cohorts (1.38%; p = 0.111). No significant differences in dd-cfDNA levels were observed between the AR cohort and either the ID or CLAD cohorts. TcfDNA was elevated only in the ID cohort (p = 0.043), and levels did not differentiate ID from AR (p = 0.234). Following AR treatment, median dd-cfDNA decreased from 2.41% at baseline to 0.80% at Day 7 (p = 0.004). Beyond 12 months post-transplant, TcfDNA was higher in BLAD vs non-BLAD (13,843 cp/mL vs 7,768 cp/mL; p = 0.005). 

Key learning: dd-cfDNA and TcfDNA show value in assessing lung allograft dysfunction beyond AR, including monitoring infection, treatment response, and BLAD. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content