All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Solid Organ Transplantation Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Preoperative living liver donor safety: Recommendations from the ILTS–iLDLT consensus conference

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jul 29, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in liver transplantation.


Recommendations on preoperative living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) safety were published in Liver Transplantation by Selzner et al. on behalf of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) and the International Living Donor Liver Transplantation (iLDLT) Group, following a consensus conference convened in March 2025 in Toronto, Canada. A total of 93 experts from 16 countries applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system and the Danish consensus model to generate 28 recommendations. 

Key data: Recommendations addressed donor acceptability (upper age limit of 60 years; elevated body mass index [BMI] alone should not exclude an otherwise suitable donor), hepatic macrovesicular steatosis thresholds (<10% ideal; 10–30% requires individualized assessment; >30% and/or steatohepatitis precludes upfront donation), medical contraindications (significant cardiac comorbidities; active or incompletely treated malignancy; bleeding and clotting disorders; uncontrolled hypertension; active hepatitis C viral infection), surgical workup (future liver remnant [FLR]/total liver volume [TLV] ratio ≥30%), and psychosocial evaluation (early assessment; active, uncontrolled psychiatric illness and problematic substance use are contraindications; motivation for donation should be altruistic). 

Key learning: Careful donor selection, supported by a thorough multidisciplinary preoperative assessment of medical, surgical, and psychosocial factors, is essential for ensuring the safety of living liver donors. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content