All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Solid Organ Transplant is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
Results from a single-center retrospective study evaluating whether 10°C static cold storage (SCS; n = 135) mitigates the impact of increasing donor age on post-transplant outcomes in adult heart transplant recipients, compared with ice storage (n = 276), were published in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery by Williams et al. Patients were stratified by donor age (18–30 years, n = 179; 30–40 years, n = 137; >40 years, n = 95). The primary outcome of interest was severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD).
Key data: When donor age was modeled as a continuous variable, 10°C SCS reduced the age-related increase in risk observed with ice storage for severe PGD (odds ratio [OR] per year, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.97; p = 0.02) and 90-day mortality (OR per year, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81–0.97; p = 0.006). After balancing for baseline characteristics, 10°C SCS was associated with lower odds of severe PGD in donor age groups 30–40 years (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02–0.68; p = 0.03) and >40 years (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.03–0.81; p = 0.04), but not donor group <30 years (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36–2.32; p = 0.23). In an exploratory post hoc analysis of donors aged >45 years, severe PGD was more frequent with ice storage vs 10°C SCS (8.7% vs 0%); these findings were not adjusted for multiplicity due to the small sample size.
Key learning: 10°C SCS may attenuate the impact of increasing donor age on severe PGD and early mortality in heart transplant recipients, supporting further evaluation of temperature-controlled static preservation strategies to expand donor-heart utilization.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content