All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Solid Organ Transplant is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
A prospective, single-center diagnostic study, evaluating the impact of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) detection using the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) in heart transplant recipients, was published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation by Valledor et al. A total of 351 for-cause endomyocardial biopsies from 223 heart transplant recipients were assessed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Key data: MMDx identified AMR more frequently than histology overall (14.8% vs 6.0%; odds ratio [OR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65–6.45; p = 0.0007), in DSA-positive samples (n = 172; 21.5% vs 10.5%; OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.33–7.07; p = 0.009), and in DSA-negative samples (n = 179; 8.4% vs 1.7%; OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.48–11.85; p = 0.007). When stratified by antibody strength, MMDx detected AMR with higher odds than histology in low-mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) samples (<4,000 MFI; 19.2% vs 2.6%; OR, 10.80; 95% CI, 2.18–53.42; p = 0.003). For MMDx-defined AMR, dd-cfDNA demonstrated greater discriminatory performance than DSA (ROC area under the curve [AUC], 0.80 vs 0.52; p < 0.001).
Key learning: These data support the diagnostic utility of adjunctive MMDx analysis in AMR assessment, where it demonstrates higher diagnostic yield than histology, particularly in cases of low-MFI DSA. A combination of molecular and plasma-based diagnostics may enhance multimodal surveillance strategies.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content