All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The SOT Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the SOT Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The SOT Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Solid Organ Transplant is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View solid organ transplantation content recommended for you
Results from a United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN) contemporary analysis, evaluating the survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) using Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0, were published in Liver Transplantation by Jutras et al. The study included adults listed for primary single-organ liver transplantation from January 1, 2021, to March 31, 2023 (N = 21,594; n = 11,251 underwent DDLT). Mortality was compared between DDLT recipients and waitlist candidates across MELD 3.0 subgroups.
Key data: DDLT recipients had a 95% lower adjusted mortality risk vs waitlist candidates (hazard ratio [HR], 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04–0.07; p < 0.001). A survival benefit emerged at MELD 3.0 scores of 12–14 (HR, 0.54; p = 0.038) and progressively increased with higher scores (15–17: HR, 0.36; 18–20: HR, 0.35; 21–23: HR, 0.20; 24–26: HR, 0.15; 27–29: HR, 0.08; 30–32: HR, 0.06; 33–35: HR, 0.04; 36–39: HR, 0.02; and 40+: HR, 0.009; all p < 0.001). In unadjusted analyses, mortality rates were 372.7 deaths per 1,000 person-years among waitlist candidates vs 83.2 deaths per 1,000 person-years among DDLT recipients; candidate mortality increased as MELD 3.0 scores rose, while post-transplant mortality was highest at both ends of the MELD 3.0 spectrum.
Key learning: These findings support MELD 3.0 scores ≥12 as a contemporary threshold for DDLT survival benefit, while emphasizing that MELD 3.0 alone should not determine candidacy; portal hypertensive complications, frailty, and quality of life (QoL) remain clinically relevant when considering transplant referral.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content